|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 20:55:47 GMT -5
You are THE lesser person.Prefer believing in fairy tales rather than truth.Others semi evolved? ha
And you are also insecure with who you are
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 19:27:07 GMT -5
did you know that atatürk was gay?^^ No no no no Dont use that as an insult.That is reserved for non-Europeans.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 19:26:11 GMT -5
Another great quote of him: " This nation has never lived without independence. We cannot and shall not live without it. Either independence or death. " So stupid.No creativity at all.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 19:11:49 GMT -5
Whats the point?
Ataturk had people change the language to make it more Turkish.Hence,its artificialness
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 17:24:34 GMT -5
Of course there are Persian and Arab words in CA Turkics! They SETTLED in a Persian influenced area and are Muslims! All Muslim groups have Arabics words in them.
Ottoman? They Osmanlica.The villagers spoke a language that was more Turkish,but it still had helluva lot of non-Turkishness.The degree of non-Turkishness in Anatolian Ottoman Turkish is was made branched off far from other Turkics.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 17:18:35 GMT -5
Yeah you do not understand. hellboy what's your favorite sport? Favourite sport? hmmmm.....Dont know.Dont know whether I have one. Well,I grew up doing competitive swimming.Training is tough but good and also boring because its repetitious. But I enjoy cycling a lot though and I also enjoy relaxing and playing swimming. But for football and these kind of team sports where you are a fan of the sports team,I dont get it.My father likes Manchester United.I dont how and why.It feels weird to ask him.And it gets on my nerves everytime they win.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 16:06:23 GMT -5
I really dont understand how can someone be a fan of a football team.........I myself am not a football fan so I dont get it at all.So boring.But I think it will be nice to see Greece do well.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 16:04:48 GMT -5
hnnn no,I havent.Yes,I get grossed out easily
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 16:03:11 GMT -5
''use it ? what do you mean hellboy ? Self - satisfy ? I think all of us. Anyway, im more concerned how to protect my kid from accessing this stuff at a young age. That is my nightmare now... ''
Use it as an aid,an arousal aid for masturbation and/or sex.Or just getting something sexual out of it by looking(naked,sexy clothed or pose,sex pictures),watching(show all those< on film),reading(on sex,sex acts,porn/sex story) and listening to porn(sex sounds,sex talk,dirty talk).
Kid from seeing? How old? Just dont let it use the internet.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 15:43:59 GMT -5
I WAS JUST ABOUT TO EAT A GREEK CLASSIC PIZZA YOU KNOW!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 15:40:32 GMT -5
but that is artificial^
Ataturk made it more similar.If it was the one that you adopted from the Turkic Ottomans,there will helluva lot of differences reflecting the Ottoman heritage.The Ottomans are Turkic who had branched off from far away from those Turkics and incorporated lotsa Arabic,Persian,Greco-Armenian stuff gradually.
Ataturk's one is artificial.Ottoman one more colourful,intresting.
And there is no language called Hindu.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 15:35:27 GMT -5
You have already used this argument in the same-sex marriage thread. You said you would agree with manijak rather than me and then manijak replied that he would never agree with you. Toskaliku probably feels the same way. na na nah My baby is just having one of his paranoid moments,Zvone. He just needs my kiss.And then he'll be alright. ;D
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 11:32:28 GMT -5
Turks certainly live in the past-the whole the West is out to split us and take our land thing is among them.Look at thracian and janny here.
And they're identity is based on lies.Likewise with their history.
Sure,Greece may teach their students otherwise,but so does Turkey.In fact,Turkey's one is even worse I will say.I dont think the Greek textbooks lie about their origins.Some of the stuff in the textbook is even supplied BY THE MILITARY OF TURKEY!!!
Can you believe that?
And they are the "Jihadis" of Turkey.Like Iran,you have the people of religion ruling the country,likewise for Turkey,they the bearers of the nation's collectivist,anti-freedom stagnatist,backward religion/ideology Kemalism.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 16, 2010 11:10:09 GMT -5
Romance is not an artificial construct^^
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 14, 2010 15:09:18 GMT -5
So what if it's a language classification?
It is well known that the Indo-Europeans travelled,conquered and settled in many places.They did so all over Europe,Central Asia,much of West Asia,a large part of the Indian subcontinent and West China.They even arrived in Morocco!
But original Indo-Europeans are Europeans(White).Just like the Turkics,you get several races who are now part of the Indo-European group:the Persians(Westna),Germans(European) and Marathis(Indians).
Just like the Turkics of the Middle East and most of Europe,the Indian and Westna(West Asians/North Africans) Indo-Europeans are largely of indigenous stock.And traces of European DNA is found among them.
I'm half Punjabi and I dont see my fellow Indo-Europeans the Swedes as my brother brother like how you Turks see the Kazakhs and other Turkics as just a first brother.I mean,we have an Indo-European connection,but thats just it.We are still very distinct.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 14, 2010 10:34:31 GMT -5
Scientists at the University of Montreal launched a search for men who had never looked at pornography - but couldn't find any. By Jonathan Liew Published: 1:22PM GMT 02 Dec 2009
Researchers were conducting a study comparing the views of men in their 20s who had never been exposed to pornography with regular users.
But their project stumbled at the first hurdle when they failed to find a single man who had not been seen it. “We started our research seeking men in their 20s who had never consumed pornography,” said Professor Simon Louis Lajeunesse. “We couldn't find any.”
Although hampered in its original aim, the study did examined the habits of those young men who used pornography – which would appear to be all of them.
Prof Lajeunesse interviewed 20 heterosexual male university students who consumed pornography, and found on average, they first watched pornography when they were 10 years old.
Around 90 per cent of consumption was on the internet, while 10 per cent of material came from video stores.
Single men watched pornography for an average of 40 minutes, three times a week, while those in relationships watched it 1.7 times a week for around 20 minutes.
The study found that men watched pornography that matched their own image of sexuality, and quickly discarded material they found offensive or distasteful.
Prof Lajeunesse said pornography did not have a negative effect on men's sexuality.
“Not one subject had a pathological sexuality,” he said. “In fact, all of their sexual practices were quite conventional.
“Pornography hasn't changed their perception of women or their relationship, which they all want to be as harmonious and fulfilling as possible,” he added.
I think all men who use the internet HAVE seen porn.But what I want to know is,how many actually use it? Just because you have seen it,doesnt mean you use it.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 14, 2010 10:28:07 GMT -5
You keep on insisting that the originate from Eastern Europe.
How is that when they speak an Altaic language? Similar to people of Northeast Asia like the Mongolians,Japanese and Koreans.
Much of the armies of the Mongols consists of Turkics.Central Asia was inhabited by Indo-Iranians.Mainland Central Asia received large Turkics who mixed with the Indo-Iranians.
Turkics in most of East Europe and the Middle East are assimilated indigenous people.Even the geneticist Spencer Wells says that of the Turks of Turkey.One of the DNA studies carried out even involved a Turkish geneticist.
Just like the "Arabs" of North Africa and in the Levant are Arabized indigenous people.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 14, 2010 8:50:28 GMT -5
When they say the Turks of Turkey are not Turks,they mean that they are not blood Turks.
Of course there are those in Turkey,the majority ethnic group,who are ETHNICALLY Turkish,whose ancestors became ethnically Ottoman/Turkish during the Ottoman Empire.
Only a minority of people in Turkey today descends from those original Turkics who settled in Anatolia.The DNA studies that I say that state most ethnic Anatolian Turks are indigenous also mention that Central Asian/Turkic DNA is found among people in Turkey,but just a minority.
And this minority,their Turkic ancestors are very distant.
You have famous people who descend from these original Turkics today:the Ottoman dynasty are the most famous of all as well as the descendants of some other rulers of Turkic principalities in Anatolia who maintained their power throughout or during Ottoman rule.
DNA studies have also shown that other Turkic ethnic groups are largely assimilated indigenous people:the Chuvash,the Gagauz and the Azeris.
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 14, 2010 8:20:52 GMT -5
I thought you are married?^^^
I wonder how many African countries have recognized it though.This is the first time I've heard an African country recognizing it
|
|
|
Post by hellboy87 on Apr 14, 2010 8:09:32 GMT -5
What is your take on this?^
Logjik,I didnt know you're 22.So am I.
Niki Nikola,I remember reading somewhere that said that women tend lose their sex drive once they get into marriage.How old is this friend of yours?
|
|